ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

The Politics of Democratic Backsliding: Executive Measures and Counter-Reactions

Europe (Central and Eastern)
Civil Society
Comparative Politics
Democracy
Executives
Institutions
Parliaments
Activism
INN353
Marko Kukec
Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Armed Forces Hamburg
Florian Grotz
Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Armed Forces Hamburg
Florian Grotz
Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Armed Forces Hamburg

Building: B, Floor: 2, Room: 204

Thursday 11:15 - 13:00 CEST (25/08/2022)

Abstract

Among the manifold forms of democratic erosion, democratic backsliding stands out as a process in which a democratically elected executive deliberately subverts the fundamental rules of the game (Bermeo 2016). To aggrandize their power, incumbent governments can take various measures. They may curtail political rights or jeopardize the rule of law by formal regulations but also employ informal restrictions against opposition parties, independent media and civil society. Furthermore, they usually do not realize their autocratic aspirations at once but proceed in incremental steps beginning with minor reforms that might pave the way for more severe actions later. While the extant literature generally accounts for the procedural and dynamic nature of democratic backsliding, less attention is given to the different means taken by executives in this process as well as the varying resistance they meet from oppositional actors. A systematic exploration of such measures and counter-reactions is warranted, as it reveals both the backsliding strategy of the executive but also the forces behind the resilience of liberal democracies. This panel focuses on executive measures towards democratic backsliding and respective counter-reactions in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. More concretely, we invite case studies and comparative analyses that conceptualize the various formal and informal tools in the arsenal of state presidents and prime ministers to pursue their anti-democratic agenda; systematically explore their usage in different contexts and over time; and/or explain their amplification or reversal in view of the responses by other actors.

Title Details
Different Means to similar Ends? Assessing the Impact of populist Rule on democratic Regimes in Europe View Paper Details
When the rule of law is under siege, is the judiciary going to resist and how? Patterns of resistances among judges in Poland, Hungary, and Romania. View Paper Details
Effects of coalitional cues on evaluations of reforms altering checks and balances View Paper Details
Conquering the centre to reclaim the state? The role of capitals in resisting autocratization in Southeast Europe View Paper Details
Steady Path to Dismantling Democracy? Tracking Illiberal Legislation in the CEE Context View Paper Details